Podcast: Is social media a waste of time?

by Elizabeth on 28/06/2010

On Friday I recorded a special edition podcast on one of my favourite topics at the moment: social media in project management with Paul Naybour from Parallel Project Training, Lindsay Scott from Arras People and How to Manage a Camel and Owain Wilson from the Association for Project Management.  We covered:

  • What is social media?
  • Can it really help deliver successful projects or is it just a fad?
  • What are the challenges with social media?

Have a listen and let me know what you think!

Share

If you liked this, you might enjoy:

  1. Social Media and Project Management: a waste of time? In this video, you’ll go behind the scenes at the podcast I recorded earlier this year with Paul Naybour from Parallel Project Training, Lindsay Scott...
  2. 25% off Get Started Using Social Media on Your Projects If completing the social media survey has made you think about how you could be using social media tools on your projects, then Get Started...
  3. The Social Media & Project Management Survey returns This year I am once again running the Social Media in a Project Environment survey. This time last year lots of you completed the survey...

  • Pingback: braintool (braintool software)

  • Pingback: thomas_weller (Thomas Weller, PMP)

  • Pingback: pmpodcast (Cornelius Fichtner)

  • Pingback: rkelly976 (Robert Kelly, PMP)

  • Pingback: corneliusficht (Cornelius Fichtner)

  • http://www.twitter.com/saslockey sas

    Fascinating! I really enjoyed the discussion about meetings and being able to use social media tools. We’ve all sat through horrid, badly chaired meetings that are just a huge waste of attention and resources.

    Seth Godin wrote a while ago about a meeting app that could be built specifically for an iPad.

    I loved this so much i tried to use aspects of it with Microsoft Communicator and sharepoint – there has been mixed success.

    I would be interested in readers thoughts:

    1. There’s an agenda, distributed by the host, visible to everyone, with time of start and stop, and it updates as the meeting progresses (we do this manually).

    2. There’s a timer, keeping things moving because it sits next to the agenda (i use a clock/stopwatch widget).

    3. The host or presenter can push an image or spreadsheet to each device whenever she chooses (we collect these before the meeting and anyone can call for them to be raised).

    4. There’s an internal back channel that the host can turn on, permitting people in the room to chat privately with each other. (And the whole thing works on internal wifi, so no internet surfing to distract!) (we have communicator online).

    5. There’s a big red ‘bored’ button that each attendee can push anonymously. The presenter can see how many red lights are lighting up at any give time. (I ask people to raise their hands if they are bored or if they think we are going off topic – its an unobtrusive and pretty analogue method but it works).

    6. There’s a bigger green ‘GO!’ button that each attendee can push anonymously. It lets the host or presenter see areas where more depth is wanted. (we just ask people for more info).

    7. There’s a queue for asking questions, so they just don’t go to the loudest, bravest or most powerful. (if people have a question they send them to the minute taker and we have a list at the end that we address)

    8. There’s a voting mechanism. (we don’t do this).

    9. There’s a whiteboard so anyone can draw an idea and push it to the group. (we have made whiteboards available but this isn’t popular!)

    10. There’s a written record of all activity created, so at the end, everyone who attended can get an email digest of what just occurred. Hey, it could even include who participated the most, who asked questions that others thought were useful, who got the most ‘boring’ button presses while speaking… (minutes are created online and so they are sent out within the hour).

    Thanks!

    • http://www.elizabeth-harrin.com Elizabeth

      Sas, these ideas would take any meeting to the next level. LiveMeeting has some (most?) of these functions built in, although they don’t have a button for being boring! They have slow down/speed up buttons which I’m sure you could customise. Having a person keeping time is also a great idea, and something that I used to do but now don’t. I wonder when I stopped? I suppose I rely on me keeping time rather than giving that responsibility to someone else. I can see that things like voting and question queues would work best with bigger meetings, as with small groups you hope that everyone can contribute without that formal structure. What do other people do?

  • Pingback: rkelly976 (Robert Kelly, PMP)

  • Pingback: jan190 (Jan Bryson)

  • http://drunkenpm.blogspot.com/ Dave Prior

    I really enjoyed this – esp. the part about 10 minutes in where you were challenging the idea of controlling the message. NICE WORK!

    • http://www.elizabeth-harrin.com Elizabeth

      Thanks, Dave! I think Paul was playing Devil’s Advocate though – I know he isn’t a control freak really!

  • Pingback: Social Media and Project Management: a waste of time?

Previous post:

Next post: